Name

by Morgan Cunningham
Showing posts with label Extra Credit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Extra Credit. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Extra Credit #3

Her biggest fear
An image of a suffering child never fails to catch one's attention. The baby pictured in a post secret submission is screaming and crying in some form of obvious pain. The heart-wrenching image supports the secret keeper's argument. “My biggest fear is that if I have a daughter, she will inherit my eating disorder.”

The saddened mother of this potential sick child is making an explicit claim but in a visual manner. Her argument's claim states that mothering a child is something she has reason to fear. Her reason, which is displayed through the image of the baby, is that her daughter would suffer the pain of an eating disorder. The secret keeper does not want to pass the misery she has suffered on to her offspring. The secret mother could be anyone, any woman in our country, considering 7 million women suffer from a eating disorder in the United States. The audience is anyone who can answer the mother's cry for help that is also an argument.

The textual support appeals to the audience's pathos. They are able to sympathize with the woman's fear due to her word choice. She is revealing her most personal fear, and the audience automatically feels her torments. Also, she directly states her reason for her fear, citing her reason in the second half of the text. This simple visual and textual argument in the form of a postcard appeals to the audience's pathos and logos. Although the audience's eyes may only lay on the image of the child's tears for a few seconds, the argument will make a lasting impression on their hearts.

"Eating Disorder Statistics." DMH. South Carolina Department of Mental Health, 2006. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. <http://www.state.sc.us/dmh/anorexia/statistics.htm>.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Extra Credit #2


 The Public Reacts to "Catching Fire"
 
From my research, it appears most the public got wind of Wrangham's theories in the summer of 2009. Before I typed my research keywords into the google search box, I prepared myself for the scathing criticisms I would have to sort through to find information to answer the third prompt on page 81. However, I was very surprised. After reading reviews of “Catching Fire,” I could not find evidence of controversy over Wrangham's developed humanistic theories. Although this certainly does not mean critical readers do not exist, for the most part it appears the public received Wrangham's book with a positive. 

The public was very surprised by the connections Wrangham made between history and science and our way of life. Also, the public and authors of both reviews I read appear to agree with Wrangham's theory. They seem on some level to be persuaded by Wrangham's text, perhaps by his use of logos and even ethos throughout the article. 

Additionally, the responses include questions about the future and about our current lifestyle. For example, in the New York Times Article, the benefits of a vegetarian diet are doubted because of Wrangham's pro-meat theory. In the second review by the Slate, the author questions whether human beings will alter their lifestyles because of the new acknowledged benefits.

Garner, Dwight. "Books of The Times - ‘Catching Fire’ by Richard Wrangham - Humans, the Cooking Apes - Review - NYTimes.com." The New York Times Books. The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia, 26 May 2009. Web. 26 Sept. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/books/27garn.html?pagewanted=all>.

Kenneally, Christine. "Richard Wrangham's Catching Fire." Slate Home. Slate Magazine, 3 June 2009. Web. 26 Sept. 2011. <http://www.slate.com/id/2219162/>.